Bookstar
2021-06-29 10:35:02
- #1
Certainly, the state must be careful, as any subsidy for homeowners disadvantages others and is largely priced in by companies. Much more important would be raising the minimum wage and, above all, lowering taxes. Both for companies and private individuals. Financing through the large companies that pay little to no taxes here. Also drastically cutting funds to the EU, then more remains for the own country (see e.g. the Corona recovery fund, Germany pays over 80 billion in, but only receives just over 23 billion euros back. Total nonsense. With the money, Greece pays shopping vouchers for vaccinations and the Italians give their homeowners photovoltaic systems, debt union at its best. Was originally forbidden or still is).
For companies to be able to raise wages, the location Germany must become more attractive. So electricity costs down, offering space cheaper and if necessary also subsidies for establishing new jobs.
Tightening insulation regulations and mandatory photovoltaics is nonsense. It must also be economically viable. If photovoltaics are worthwhile for the builder, then no regulation is needed. Rather a good feed-in tariff or intelligent storage solutions possibly also for residential areas in total.
There are options beyond obligations and bans.
For companies to be able to raise wages, the location Germany must become more attractive. So electricity costs down, offering space cheaper and if necessary also subsidies for establishing new jobs.
Tightening insulation regulations and mandatory photovoltaics is nonsense. It must also be economically viable. If photovoltaics are worthwhile for the builder, then no regulation is needed. Rather a good feed-in tariff or intelligent storage solutions possibly also for residential areas in total.
There are options beyond obligations and bans.