face26
2022-03-10 15:36:56
- #1
That is viewed very undifferentiated. In rural areas, the homeownership rate is around 60-65% depending on the federal state. In Berlin, it is only around 17%. In the other city-states the situation is similar and also in the big cities. And these have historically been extremely heavily destroyed. The concentration of wealth and thus the ability to acquire real estate cements the situation. Additionally, the historically very hesitant lending compared to other countries... the tendency not to move much, but to "build only once in a lifetime"... there are so many factors. To reduce the whole thing to strong tenant rights and high additional costs is really too simplistic.
That is not viewed undifferentiated. That is just a brief summary of what the main factors are. I do not have a collection of studies at hand now but from memory I have read these things several times in articles and studies.
The extreme differences between city and countryside are rather natural. Without knowing the numbers, I would claim that other countries have similar relationships between city and countryside.
I also remember the factor of destruction in World War II. The factor here is that after World War II a lot was invested in building rental apartments and therefore relatively many good rental apartments were available.
But that does not change the other factors. And no one said that those are the only factors, just the main factors. That is, by the way, also the result of several studies from recent years, as mentioned above.
One small correction: I was not talking about the additional costs in case you meant me with that, but about building regulations. However, the additional costs also play a role.