Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

We should dedicate ourselves to world political realpolitik and write off idealism (outwardly)

I totally agree with that. The reality is that people consume more resources than are available. We are tapping into reserves that have been built up over x million years. Realpolitik confronts this challenge head-on and does not idealize golden calves.

I read here enlightening and frightening things and wonder about narrow-mindedness combined with dictatorship fantasies. Specifically. If due to the explosion of costs some have built smaller or simpler, no reason to mourn. As the owner and resident of a deliberately simple and inexpensive house, 280 thousand all inclusive with lake view, built in 2017, I can say, you miss nothing. The white Polish windows are tight and you can look through, the gas boiler works completely problem-free, the doorbell rings even without a camera and fingerprint sensor, the Ikea kitchen cooks and bakes, even though it only cost 4600, the CPL doors open and close, the bathroom bathes, the toilet flushes, the shower showers. No worries be happy, pinkiponk. The narrow-minded. The neighbor, the environmental pig, burns 30 thousand liters of oil p.a. So what, Germany has a 2% share in climate change, converted to CO2, and of these 2% there is max 1% with swimming pool and 30000 l oil, so, let him be, it’s his money, crucifying him brings nothing, doesn’t save the world. Dictatorship fantasies, ban, regulate, prescribe, all justified, we are saving the Earth... remember the two percent. Yes, then you have to... the others don’t want to, Poland continues to rely on coal from Katowice, and France on nuclear power, and now the eco-warrior wants to start the world-saving war? Force them? Because of just two percent, that doesn’t achieve anything else, salvation for this Earth through redemption from the Jew someone once wanted, today the new Jew drives a Porsche, has a swimming pool or flies by plane and wants a home of his own. He also likes to barbecue. Or she. Instead of keeping a low profile and thinking factually and openly about technology, there are bans and attacks until the doctor comes. Preferably on Friday. That's when the Audi Q7 at the corner sometimes gets scratched, because of saving the world.

Instead of keeping things calm, factual and open to technology, it gets banned and dissected until the doctor comes.

I think keeping a low profile is good. Avoiding finger-pointing as well. The only problem is when the ball is held so low that no one wants to think outside their comfort gel. There are undeniable challenges in resource management and the effects are noticeable. A "carry on as before" is definitely a bad decision. So it's worth striving for a better decision. As individuals, we can't manage it, and I expressly include myself in that.

Well, considering that we only account for 1.1% of the world's population, a 2% share of CO2 is not so great. Or put another way: on average, 5 tons of CO2 are emitted per capita per year. Every German produces 9.7 tons of CO2 per year. We are among the top 10 and should not sit back. We could even be the nation that develops the technical innovations to counter environmental destruction. But instead, the X7 has to be put on the altar.

I Heil for this earth through salvation from the Jew was desired by someone once, today the new Jew drives a Porsche, has a swimming pool or flies a plane and wants a home of his own. He also likes to grill. Or she.

Equating the death of millions in gas chambers and by execution squads with the regulation of CO2 consumption is simply disgusting.

It was an analogy against the grand plans from above. The problem is that you cannot project the past onto the future when the problem is unique and new. Liberal individualism offers exactly zero solutions. More than "et hät noch immer jot jegange" you don't get from either - how could it be otherwise: zero people in the world have a realistic idea of how anything relevant can be done without massive interventions.