BackSteinGotik
2021-04-26 12:51:27
- #1
The conclusion is that the price is indeed higher, but it costs you less monthly, and in 10 years you will have at least 20-25% more salary in total.
Your purchasing power is significantly better, and the rate makes up a smaller percentage monthly than it did in 2010.
Unfortunately, this is not shown or the people are not enlightened. Then it’s just said that the bad investors or speculators or whatever...
Instead of teaching facial interpretation in school over years, it would be better to teach economic contexts and life.
Uhm, in school life should be taught instead of faces? But I actually think proper math and writing are basically good too.. ;)
Otherwise, you are mistaken in many places. The "profits" from lower interest rates have long been eaten up by inflated prices. At the latest since 2015. This is exactly where the "fallback potentials" that appear in the banks' reports come from. The well-known warmed nitrogen-oxygen mixture.
You also simply assume that the salaries of 30- to 40-year-old prospective buyers in 10 years (in the same position) will be 20-25% higher net today. This is certainly not true overall when looking at real wage indicators.
The only relevant factor is the ratio of housing costs plus credit to household income. Over one-third is a critical value, and in many places, it is reported that large parts of new tenants, new builders, or buyers of used properties exceed this.
The current situation—end of the Baukindergeld, "normal" 10% price increase plus raw material bubble—will again push many people out of the potential circle. Which, by the way, was the quintessence of the documentary—simple job—no chance. One academic + one vocational training—hardly a chance—two academics—only with really good jobs, both working & no fear of really high debts.
Exceptions prove the rule, mostly through inherited equity.