WilderSueden
2023-06-22 11:09:44
- #1
Only, the 100k after 45 years are not worth 100k. With 2% inflation, that corresponds rather to 40k in today's money, then you still have to pay taxes on the nominal gain (so also on the inflation). After taxes, at best, only a third of the 100k remains. From that, you can then withdraw about a hundred euros of today's purchasing power per month. For retirement provision, you have to go big, not small. The real problem with this story is not knowledge or preparation. It is the multiple burden of, on the one hand, paying high pension contributions for the older generation, and on the other hand, providing for your own old age. And then you should also have children to stabilize the system. It also doesn't really help that the state disguises a subsidy program for the insurance industry as retirement provision. Because a Riester plan is, in most cases, nothing else, and the typical company pension scheme is also bad. The tax and social security contribution advantages during the accumulation phase are largely eaten up by the corresponding burdens during the payout phase, and the high costs and low returns give the scheme the rest. Especially for people who started their working life in the 2010s, Riester and company pensions are worthless due to guarantees combined with zero interest rates.Starting a fund savings plan with 50 euros at 20 years old, saving for 45 years, and presto, you have just over 100,000 euros in the portfolio at retirement.