What other reason is there besides selling the house? Otherwise, utilization of the property is not possible, but that is a tightrope walk.
Section 490 paragraph 2 initially only mentions legitimate interest and explains that an alternative utilization explicitly (in particular) constitutes such. This neither excludes other legitimate interests nor defines that alternative utilization can only be a sale. In my case, I wanted to refinance my condominium. First, the land charge had been released through repayment; second, a larger land charge would have been possible due to appreciation in value. However, the ING did not want to do that, so I wanted to redeem the ING and go elsewhere with a completely new, larger financing. = alternative utilization / legitimate interest. But the ING denied me that as well. We could have sued, with a good chance of success, but we didn't have the time. Fortunately, we then found a bank that did it in second lien.