Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

With photovoltaics?

Not yet. But the money for the photovoltaics has to be raised first.

And maybe regionally produced food will once again have a higher value among the general public in the future. However, since they are more expensive than at the discount store - rather not.

In my immediate surroundings, I have been experiencing for years that regionally produced food is gaining more importance and is being purchased more. The prices for the following regionally produced products are at the same level as in the supermarket, partly even cheaper:

Eggs, flour, milk, potatoes, asparagus, organic beef, fruit juices, honey, jam, butter.

We now buy these products exclusively from regional producers, partly directly from the producers. And if sometimes an egg costs 3 cents more than in the supermarket, I don't care. I know that the products come from the region, are absolutely fresh, are not transported across half of Europe, and often taste more intense/more natural. Regardless of that, I enjoy the shopping experience at weekly markets and farm shops.

5. Targeted measures could be taken against the deforestation of the rainforest, for example by imposing tariffs on such soy. For this, it is neither necessary to force everyone to go vegan nor to fundamentally prohibit new development areas. And as long as we still spend a lot of money growing plants on fields that are not even indirectly intended for consumption, I simply do not accept the blanket argument of land consumption.

I have nothing against new development areas. I have something against dying and vacant inner cities where the entire infrastructure (gas, water, electricity, telephone, sewer, roads, sidewalks, street lighting, etc.) is already in place but unused. A society must first be able to afford the luxury of leaving this infrastructure unused and continuing to maintain and uphold it. My hometown has had a very stable population for 30 years. However, the built-up area has increased by 25%, along with the number of employees in the municipal public works department and the costs for road construction and maintenance. This money could be used much more sensibly...

I have nothing against new development areas. I do have something against dying and vacant inner cities, where the entire infrastructure (gas, water, electricity, telephone, sewer, road, sidewalk, street lighting, etc.) is already in place and not being used. Society must first be able to afford the luxury of leaving this infrastructure unused and continuing to maintain and keep it.

My hometown has had a very stable population for 30 years. However, the developed area has increased by 25%, along with the number of employees in the municipal building yard and the costs for road construction and maintenance. This money could be used much more sensibly...

I completely agree with you. Only the area in town centers is not very popular. No square, practical plots, often a bit more traffic, plus restrictions due to building gaps, too narrow, Paragraph 34, demolition costs (which is usually enough to make the plot cheaper than the area). It is a long way until the right measures are found and take effect. In our case, there have been measures for about 15 years and it feels like now the point has been reached where the right levers have been found. More and more is being built, demolished, and renovated.

It is very strange when you have to be satisfied with DSL at 6 Mbit in the old, established residential area, and fresh fiber optic is laid 1 km away in the new development area "auf'm Acker". You feel a bit fooled as a child of a building gap...

Complete inflation adjustments are unrealistic and also not sensible, as they only fuel inflation equally.

If there is 7% inflation, gross wages would have to increase by 14% to compensate 1:1. Everyone can consider for themselves how realistic that is.