Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

Environmental destruction... Oh, I see. What about when you fly to Australia or build a 160m² house with a double garage? 100m² would be enough, wouldn't it? The classic single-family house is by far the most inefficient way to create living space. So don't keep talking about climate protection ;)

The bee does not bother to explain to the fly that shit is disgusting. She simply ignores it.

Are you the fly in this comparison? Or the shxxx?

Are you the fly in this comparison? Or the Schexxx?

Are you a Bookstar fan or what are you trying to tell me?

Since we are talking about CO2... wasn’t someone here from Australia or has family there? A flight Sydney and back from Frankfurt, about 11t CO2 per person. 20,000 kWh natural gas (for the average household) a good 4t. To put that into perspective. A new building of 150m² has about 10,000 kWh natural gas demand...

A round-trip flight Berlin-Riyadh is about 10 flight hours in total. The Airbus A340-300 of the flight readiness "Theodor Heuss," with which our federal foreign trulla flew a few days ago, needed about 75,000 liters of kerosene, producing almost 300 tons of CO2. And the replacement plane, which flew in after the accident, probably even that much again ;) Doesn’t matter, we'll just build 2 wind turbines and 300 heat pumps, then everything will be fine again... at least until the next foreign trip of our values (in brackets) minister... Lufthansa line First Class wouldn’t be proper, after all: remember: those who have, have! And those who can, can!

And why can't everyone just click ignore on once? Can't you just leave the troll alone? Or we send him a chemtrail plane and brainwash him.

Because he represents a social phenomenon that runs through all educational and age groups.

It is the lack of ability to distinguish between natural science, other branches of science, statements by scientists as opinions, and statements by third parties about scientists’ opinions, which were previously equated with science. Everything is thrown together and out comes a loss of trust in that external expertise which says something different than what one felt they always knew anyway. The result is diving into a bubble where what one already had as prejudices applies. This bubble is protected by weak, sometimes completely absent self-reflection.

In fact, a (supposed) failure of science in area A says nothing about the quality of insights in area B. One would have to reassess every time. Simple heuristics like “once screwed up, always…” do not apply.

This is not understood, not applied, and is often the root of this whole conspiracy nonsense.

Environmental destruction... Oh, I see.

Very good, at least you do not deny man-made climate change!