Why should I lower the price now for a property that is scarce and whose land value will most likely continue to rise?? There will always be a buyer...
Because it is no longer affordable? The prices for 40-50 year old existing properties were already outrageous before. In the rural areas where we searched, 400k was being asked for a run-down house of that age and was also paid. But a thorough renovation was still necessary then. New heating, bathrooms, facade, etc. And compared to autumn '20, it has worsened in that you can no longer simply replace an oil burner relatively cheaply with gas. That in Baden-Württemberg you now also have to install photovoltaics when renovating the roof. Material shortages and exploding material prices. Now interest rates have been added. If the bank does not value the house as highly as the buyer, the premium hurts twice as much when you are already at your limit. In most areas, the valuable part is not the land value but the house. In areas with a land value below 100€, a plot is then only worth 70k. Even if that still rises, if the house on it is a money pit, it simply does not make sense. And there's not always a buyer, at least not at ever higher prices. If the financing of the highest bidder fails due to lack of creditworthiness or valuation, the second one comes into play. If their financing fails as well... edit: maybe one should also consider here that there is not only buying or building. If prices rise so much that you make the bank your landlord... then you might as well remain a tenant. You know that the law is on your side, you don’t have to worry about maintenance and remain flexible. At prices of 40-50 years of cold rent and >2.5% interest, buying is purely a bet on value appreciation. The saved rent then no longer even covers the interest.