Everyone is allowed to form their own opinion and take risks. My goal was merely to point out the problem and not to fall for every advertising slogan of a solar technician. Incidentally, the judgment cannot simply be dismissed as a first-instance decision. According to the tax court, there is basically only the BFH (disregarding European law and constitutional law), and in the present case, an appeal was rejected precisely with reference to the BFH NV. "The appeal pursuant to § 115 para. 1 FGO was not to be admitted. In particular, there is no case of fundamental importance. It has already been decided by the highest court that a power storage system does not belong to the essential components for the operation of a photovoltaic system (BFH decision of February 7, 2018 V B 105/17, BFH/NV 2018, 536)." But enough of tax law now. After all, it is the weekend.