I would also like to counter with a generalization: Many parents are comfortable to lazy and the way where others take care of their own child is the easiest. Therefore, the places are scarce.
Our children are both still at home; my wife does not work. We are still considering sending our daughter to daycare half-day, simply because we think that contact with children of the same age will do her good. We do have friends with children as well, but unfortunately, they are all still younger and our daughter can hardly relate to them. Her brother is also still too young. And we simply notice how much she enjoys playing with peers when we are at the playground. Therefore, we will probably bite the bullet and pay the 320 euros, which the daycare costs for four hours daily per month for us - but definitely not out of laziness (instead of playing with our daughter and son, my wife will then "only" play with our son during those four hours - and not lounge around).
The attached quote fits quite well, I think. Even though I find it a bit ridiculous, I estimate it similarly to .
In the most expensive houses? For example, we are building a promotional house with 130 sqm - without a basement, without a garage, without a carport, absolute standard equipment. And from what we have heard so far, most people in the new development area are building very modest houses. No one can afford an expensive house anymore given the land prices. As far as I know, everyone except us also originally comes from the area and just wants to live where they grew up and where their family and friends live. So I do not understand in what way the attached quote applies here.