Buschreiter
2023-01-04 21:48:24
- #1
I always find it interesting that the prices on the portals are referred to. At least in my area, the properties listed there are the ones that do not sell under the table. There are usually reasons for that!
By the way, the plan is risky in that politics will eventually be forced to require existing buildings to undergo renovation. Or they have to give up their CO₂ targets. But comprehensive protection of existing buildings and large savings at the same time will not be possible.
That will not work like that and most likely will not happen. Normally, the state can only spend money that it has previously collected through taxes. Broad promotion of building renovation or electric cars is then simply left hand - right hand money. The last decade was abnormal and debt was cheap. So recently, everything and everyone was subsidized. Since the central bank can create money out of nothing but not goods and services, this merely drove up prices in the subsidized sectors. Inflation and the interest rate turnaround are currently putting an end to the topic; furthermore, the state will need all resources for the foreseeable future to compensate for the imbalance in social security systems—especially pensions—that arise from demographics. The baby boomers are almost all still in the workforce, and the federal budget is already a pass-through heater for social security. I cannot understand how anyone could think that the state will then compensate for every restriction arising from what was promised before the election. No diesel drivers were compensated for no longer being allowed to drive into certain cities. The same applied a few years earlier with environmental zones; that was the owner's problem. And many property owners will also face a rude awakening. Rent-free is simply not cost-free. And if necessary, the state just plays through intermediaries and pushes EU regulations forward, which it itself helped to decide. Quite simple.As soon as political compulsion is behind it, it will/must be correspondingly promoted...
Imbalance in social security - especially pensions
And if necessary, the state just plays it through the boards and pushes EU guidelines that it has co-decided. Quite simple