Nonsense. If the land was equity and you built the house yourself over several years back then, it was of course cheaper than today. But today, with turnkey construction (preferably also with flooring/painting), it is more expensive for most people because they no longer want to do any work themselves.
Blabbermouth!!! Is my calculation right or wrong? When you realize that you are writing something wrong, you immediately respond with "that’s not what I meant" and "I am right after all."
There was no mention of the land equaling equity. You literally said
"Just imagine that within 40 years you have to spend 168,000€ for a 700 sqm plot instead of 21,000€."
If the land was equity back then and still is today, then it’s even better. Because then the equity ratio has massively increased compared to back then. The construction cost index in 2020 was “only” more than twice as high as in 1980. So construction prices double or increase 2.5 times, land value increases tenfold. Salaries have also more than doubled from 1980 to 2020. So why is it harder today? This statement itself is simply wrong. It was more expensive and harder to afford a house in 1980 than in 2020.
However, I agree with you that more sweat equity was contributed in the past. And people simply built a house – not a shack with all kinds of (expensive to pay for and finance) frills. And only the required space. Today, you’re already considered poor if a couple without children builds less than 140-150 sqm of house. Back then we drove to Austria once a year by car for vacation. Today there has to be a flight trip to the Canaries in summer plus various other trips during other holidays. Back then just one phone + ARD/ZDF. Today three cell phones + DAZN + Prime + Sky + Disney+.
That’s why there’s no money left for the house today.