I can understand Gen Z, they no longer have a chance to build anything. The state is insatiable and the charges will continue to explode. If you invite the whole world in, then it simply becomes very expensive in the welfare state. The only party that finally wants to tackle this is being scandalized by the media. Still at almost 20%, with a tendency to increase further.
Interesting that this right-wing statement and the myth of the expensive welfare state and insatiable state and the previous posts remain as they are here. While I share the criticism of regarding the corona measures, I see no connection here between the refugees taken in and rising construction costs and the burden on the younger generation. And the party that "wants to tackle this" primarily wants to change asylum policy. Otherwise, it differs only on corona and Ukraine/war issues (sad that only and exactly the AfD opposes here) from the CDU and FDP. In terms of environmental protection and economic policy and also social policy (also for "Germans"), this seemingly committed party fits perfectly with the hardliners among the conservatives. If you want to enable a broader section of the population to access affordable housing and also home ownership, it is no use building fences and letting ships sink. Income and wealth have simply diverged so strongly in the last 30 years that fewer and fewer people have money left over. At the same time, social benefits were cut back (Hartz IV and the new Bürgergeld relabeling) and thereby wages were kept low overall for the broad masses. On the other hand, the top tax rate was reduced, loopholes for corporations (see Starbucks, Apple, Amazon, etc.) and capital owners were created (capital gains tax) or tolerated (Cum-Ex, Scholz-Warburg), spending on basic services and infrastructure was cut back (closure of hospitals, privatization of nursing care -> profit outflow to private entities, decline of DB and route closures), general losses and risks were socialized (bank rescues, corona measures for large corporations while bonuses and dividends were paid, nuclear phase-out-entry-reentry-exit severance payments) and the tax and charge burden for the majority of the population was increased (broadcasting fee, fixed costs for fees instead of taxes, expensive public transport - subsidized highways, cold progression due to inflation).