Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

  • Erstellt am 2021-04-23 10:46:58

haydee

2022-06-20 13:10:40
  • #1
No, it was not politically intended. It simply became unprofitable to store three wagons somewhere and pick them up later. On top of that, the logistics: loading here for Frankfurt, here for Hamburg, and there for the plant in Klecksdorf. Klecksdorf is loaded, damn, it’s standing all the way in the back, others have to go first. Then the small sidings on private property were shut down, everything was driven by truck to the next big station and reloaded. Unprofitable, by the time the stuff is reloaded, you might as well drive straight to the destination, and voila, just-in-time for small quantities is possible. That was a process long before privatization.
 

Scout**

2022-06-20 13:11:53
  • #2
I have never seen such signs with more than 130 in my 29 years of driving license and around 600,000 km of driving experience. Besides, when it comes to speed limits, 130 km/h is always implicitly assumed. But why not 140, 150, 100 or even 120?! In my opinion, 130 is quite arbitrary.
 

WilderSueden

2022-06-20 13:15:44
  • #3
130 is already the advisory speed and also the limit in various neighboring countries. In others it is 120, so it makes sense to choose one of the two options instead of settling on 123.45 by committee.
 

i_b_n_a_n

2022-06-20 13:44:52
  • #4
Might be, but I still have a different opinion. Because political influence on the railway didn’t start only with privatization. MEA owns the railway, like other things (water, electricity, telephone) should be publicly owned. The fact that these things are more efficient economically overall, even though they appear (without an overall economic perspective) to be unprofitable, could be an argument? But as long as I (and others who babble about political things here) don’t get politically involved, it all remains just pub talk ;)
 

In der Ruine

2022-06-20 13:44:59
  • #5
Not really. But I took the quote from the newspaper seriously and not as a Postillion contribution.
 

i_b_n_a_n

2022-06-20 13:46:56
  • #6
The quote is of course real. But my own contribution to it is naturally meant ironically. Otherwise, you would have to start crying with so much real-life satire.
 

Similar topics
18.12.2017What to do if the tenant simply stops paying?29
26.10.2008New owner: Tenants must leave!10
08.11.2013Electricity at the house connection for provider - Installation of server cabinet10
07.07.2016Electricity and water supply before construction begins?27
13.12.2016Lawn mower with electricity, battery, or petrol?47
08.08.2016Connection costs for telecom, cable, electricity10
06.03.2017Kitchen island - with electricity! A thought experiment...11
03.07.2017Are the costs for the electricity house connection justified?10
06.02.2018Solar for hot water/heating or better photovoltaic for electricity?21
21.02.2018Heating with electricity - infrared heating? Experiences wanted17
15.05.2018Water, gas, and electricity - disconnection and reconnection?10
19.06.2018Help: Identifying causes of high electricity and water costs14
17.02.2019Dimensioning of house connection electricity/gas/water11
08.03.2020Connections for electricity etc. for front yard and garden23
10.02.2021Run electricity from the house to the garage11
28.07.2020Electricity/Telecom connection costs28
28.06.2020Connection for network power supply very expensive?!23
07.03.2022How to connect an outdoor camera? LAN, power or battery25
28.03.2021Strom-Cloud experiences vs. feed-in tariff?94

Oben