Joedreck
2022-06-07 14:05:38
- #1
That’s true... With 30 days of vacation, you really don’t get far. The valuable time is the few hours after work and the 12 hours per day on weekends. No one claims that it’s easy. It’s partly hard, tough work. But with that, you can save money very effectively. Nobody was willing to do that in the recent prosperous years because an extra 100k basically didn’t cost anything and you have "expectations." In my circle, I saw how renovation-needy houses were bought and renovated by people with obvious migration backgrounds. They don’t have more money. They got off their asses for self-performance. Now a time will come again when for many people that is the only way to acquire and live in property. If you DON’T WANT to do that, that’s one thing. But in my opinion, almost everyone can do it.I believe the only way to financially come out better with an existing property than with a new build is if you don’t do a complete renovation and can initially live with some imperfections / the lower insulation standards of the older house. Buying an old house and renovating it up to new standards usually costs just as much or even more than building a new one from scratch. That’s not to say I’m against renovations—I find them important and even necessary—but one shouldn’t fool themselves into thinking it’s cheaper. I also think self-performance is often overrated. To really save money, you have to have the time and possibly "take" it at a cost. With 30 days of vacation per year, you won’t get far with real self-performance. And taking unpaid time off is often possible, but if you want to be honest with yourself, you have to convert that into money.