From the gut, I would say that the real estate transfer tax can remain but should be reduced. Especially for people who will subsequently occupy the property. Or the tax could be graduated. First property without tax, then progressively increasing. Regarding housing construction, I would also say from the gut that only a state cooperative, which operates merely at cost, can do that. Especially in metropolitan areas, living space will naturally not become cheaper. It can't either, because the scarcity of building land leads to high prices. Likewise, rent is determined by supply and demand. The question is also whether one even wants that. Indeed, there are so many aspects to consider here that it is difficult to predict all the consequences. By the way, I find it funny when someone implicitly claims that they are one of the few who have a full overview of a highly complex market situation with various players.