Nida35a
2021-12-20 10:08:08
- #1
and that is exactly why our car will keep running for 3 or 5 or 10 years, no new one has to be built for us ;)I prefer the principle that everyone should sweep in front of their own door,
Adblocker erkannt
and that is exactly why our car will keep running for 3 or 5 or 10 years, no new one has to be built for us ;)I prefer the principle that everyone should sweep in front of their own door,
On the topic, I agree with you – however, one should distinguish between babble threads and focused topics. And congratulations: you made it this far. Right in the middle of your opinion:Construction costs are currently through the roof
Sorry, but I don’t have any children at all! So what? Am I pathetic because today I have already baked cookies, watched a film, cleaned and cooked, and am now relaxing here while reading/writing and not playing Lego?Don’t you have children too, …. really pathetic. But playing Lego with a 5-year-old isn’t that exciting, I know that.
Uh… there are already several here who have personal contact through visits and phone calls with real names… :DThere is no winner takes all option, you will never meet ... give up
It is also much easier to point fingers at other people's dirt when your own yard looks spotless. And you can even sell your super efficient sweeping techniques and hypermodern automatic brooms.
And that's why we just keep going like this? I prefer the principle that everyone should sweep in front of their own door, instead of doing nothing and pointing at the neighbors' dirt. After all, we are in 6th place among the largest CO2 emitters and have the technical and financial means and the infrastructure to cause much, much less damage. And thus export possibilities for change as experience. We are 1.1% of the world population and produce 1.6% of the global CO2 emissions. People just have no desire, are too lazy, too consumption-oriented.
It’s happening the other way around now because "voluntary commitments" just don’t work. Even in cities with very good public transport, many people still prefer to drive their cars right up to the locker room. You could send them a personal sedan chair, and they would still prefer to take their own car. Their own comfort is valued more highly than the collateral consequences.No, but there is a world of difference between "just keep going" and blind overzealousness. Phasing out coal is good if you THINK ABOUT new jobs for those working there BEFOREHAND. Increasing restrictions on drivers in the city are good if you ESTABLISH a reasonable public transport system BEFOREHAND. Phasing out nuclear power is good if you THINK ABOUT affordable energy for those who need it BEFOREHAND, those who cannot adjust within a few months to save half of their energy. At the moment, I have the feeling that it’s happening the other way around. And then we shouldn’t be surprised if people vote radically.
| Similar topics | ||
| 06.02.2020 | Energy "concept" for old farmhouse | 30 |
| 22.02.2024 | Heat pumps require a lot of energy and make noise | 73 |