Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

Tax avoidance tactics can only work because the legislation has gaps in certain areas. These gaps should be efficiently closed before inventing new things. Personally, I am also not willing to pay more taxes while politics massively wastes tax money.

To revisit the topic of inheritance, I ask myself what prevents the middle class from investing sustainably? It is simply their own attitude. They consume like there's no tomorrow, but hardly invest anything. Then they have nothing to bequeath.
Furthermore, poverty in this country must and has to be addressed. Children from socially disadvantaged backgrounds must also have good educational opportunities. That costs money. But instead of "taking it away" from others, the state must first become more efficient.
Because if I am doing well, taken care of, and can manage my life through my own efforts, then I couldn’t care less how rich someone is.

A bit naive. Then it catches one out of 1000 who was too stupid to organize their money properly beforehand. The money simply moves abroad, where it is partly already located, or the assets are transferred beforehand.

Taxes must be properly paid beforehand, and that means in the country where the proceeds were generated and not in more tax-friendly countries, e.g. Ireland.

There was a documentary about this once. That would make Germany lose money. We're probably talking about Amazon, Google, Microsoft, etc.? But we quickly forget that VW, Mercedes, Bosch, Bayer, SAP, etc. have their headquarters in Germany.

In my opinion, it is once again a hypocritical debate, like currently around [Lindner]'s plans.

Finally, the topic is being addressed, but the "little ones" are not being relieved enough. Classic rich people and FDP bashing. The fact that the "little ones" hardly pay any taxes anyway is ignored. The social security contributions are more of a problem than the taxes.

Just enter €2500 gross and for comparison €5000 gross into a net income calculator with tax class 1 and be surprised.

I agree to a large extent, but you can do one thing without neglecting the other. For example, what do you think causes these gaps in the legislation? Was someone simply too stupid? I'll answer right away. No, experts who draft laws are very rarely stupid. Unfortunately, they are not all morally infallible. Most tax avoidance loopholes have been introduced by lobbyists who in turn were hired by the richest in society. They are also the ones who fight at all costs to not only stay at the top but to make the gap even bigger. And that is exactly what inheritance tax is partly about. That this is not just possible.

If I am well, provided for, and can manage my life through my own effort, then I can not care at all how rich someone is.

Yes, but for that to remain so, unfortunately you have to ensure that not a few accumulate too much power. Because if suddenly the rich decide how the affairs of the state run, at least for me, the indifference stops. Otherwise, we are simply overfed cattle. And if we get sake and are massaged. But in the end, (are?) we cattle.

Politics cannot close every niche completely and plaster them with x-laws. Simple and clear rules must be created that apply to everyone; the coal that then remains, remains. Done.

Yes, but to keep it that way, you unfortunately have to ensure that not a few accumulate too much power.
Because if suddenly the rich determine how the affairs of the state run, at least for me, the indifference stops. Otherwise, we are simply fattened cattle. And if we get sake and are massaged. But in the end, we would (are?) cattle.

The choice of words is already pretty ridiculous, sorry.

The whole issue is pointless anyway, as long as there are still not enough tax auditors.