Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

  • Erstellt am 2021-04-23 10:46:58

xMisterDx

2023-07-03 22:18:44
  • #1


Um... was there another bottle of hard liquor involved yesterday? It was late and Sunday before the new stupid work week anyway... Contract without a fixed building plot? Did you mix something up while drunk?

Sorry, but anyone who doesn't understand "didn't lift a finger" until turnkey handover and "did a lot themselves" from turnkey handover really should ignore my posts. It's just too complicated for them then. That's not bad, not everyone can do it.
 

Sunshine387

2023-07-03 22:21:55
  • #2
How can more than half of the construction costs be KFW subsidies? That doesn't add up...
 

xMisterDx

2023-07-03 22:22:59
  • #3


Well... actually the issue is settled by the fact that there is simply no fundamental right to live at affordable prices at Stachus or in Kreuzberg. Where it is popular, prices rise; ultimately, this is, with certain limitations, a market economy.

And subsidies won’t help us there either. I just read on ntv that the heat pump is supposed to become as cheap as a gas heating system through subsidies. That is of course nonsense. The heat pump remains expensive; part of the cost is simply paid by someone else, in all likelihood the taxpayer. So not only Mrs. Klatten, but also the cashier and the bus driver, who already groans under the high rent and high prices.
 

Sunshine387

2023-07-03 22:24:56
  • #4
And what is the alternative? Not giving his voter base the heat pump and losing deputies in the next election?
 

xMisterDx

2023-07-03 22:31:18
  • #5
I don't really believe that the Greens will lose many seats. They won't gain massively, yes. But it won't go below 14% either.
 

Buchsbaum

2023-07-03 22:33:53
  • #6
It is the system that makes it not worth building a granny flat. Or even two or more.

The legislation is landlord-unfriendly. If the tenant does not pay the rent or intentionally damages the apartment, then as a landlord I have no or very few rights, which in serious cases can threaten my existence. It cannot be that as a landlord I need a year to evict the tenant and have to pay thousands of euros in advance for eviction, etc.

Billing, requirements, etc. do not make renting more attractive.

Combined with tax incentives and more landlord-friendly legislation, it would be easier again to create living space.
An immediate termination of a tenancy only causes the tenant to shrug their shoulders a little.

In Spain, you go to jail if the apartment is destroyed and the damage is not compensated. Late rent payments are considered fraud there. Here there is the rent receipt fraud. But with one partial payment of the rent, it is already bypassed.
It can happen that someone moves in with you and lives for a year without paying even one euro in rent. You can understand why houses and apartments stand empty.

But all this will develop. Currently, in red-green Berlin, they would rather discuss the expropriation of housing corporations than create incentives for housing construction. The new dilettante heating law then further hinders this.

The economist Schnitzer calls for an annual immigration of 1.5 million skilled workers. I do not know where all of them are supposed to live?
And whether they even want to come here. We are not the center of the world. Or rather, no longer.
In the GDR, they still passed a housing construction program in the seventies. Well, they were mostly prefabricated buildings with district heating.
Back then, ahead of their time. Habeck would be proud of it, but in 1989 the housing problem of the GDR was largely solved.

In 1973, the GDR’s housing construction program was passed and by 1989 three million apartments were built. With only 16 million inhabitants. I always knew that in the GDR we were decades ahead of our time.

They already had district heating networks, public transport was electrified, the entire train and bus traffic was coordinated, the green wave and traffic controls had long been in the cities, the construction of single-family homes was regulated, individual traffic as well, there were only a few cars and the highways were empty. Only one in four GDR citizens had their own car.

Man, how progressive we were back then.
 

Similar topics
22.11.2013Costs of inheritance, demolition, new construction15
13.09.2014Multi-family house: arrangement of residential units, trees, etc.35
09.06.2016Project multifamily house: Questions about costs and procedure24
12.11.2016Extremely high pellet consumption (200kg in 3 days) in a Kfw70 multi-family house!37
05.07.2017House sale - New construction - Bank plays along - Risk?14
05.09.2019New construction alongside an existing old property10
11.02.2020New construction, selling, renting? Idea generation23
29.05.2020New construction with existing debt - feasibility question44
15.05.2020Multi-family house with 6 residential units - Current status and next steps13
04.11.2020Planning a multi-family house - optimizing costs73
02.09.2021Planning of multi-family house 1200 €/m²58
20.01.2022New single-family house 140 - Is it financially feasible like this?58
30.01.2022Demolition and reconstruction or renovation?33
28.02.2022Effects of the war on construction costs and interest rates?117
30.03.2022Developer New Build: Buy two apartments and then combine them18
31.01.2023House purchase built in 1995 vs. new construction long-term cost calculation35
26.05.2025Which heating system for a multi-family house, heat pump not eligible for subsidies?23
18.12.2023Construction costs for a multi-family house with 10 residential units, fully basemented19
04.04.2024Cost savings for demolition and new construction?22
14.04.2025Floor plan of a new multi-family house with 3 residential units, living area approx. 350 m²72

Oben