Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

What has definitely become much cheaper now is solar. Nobody buys them anymore. The warehouses are now full of these things, you can get them by the pallet cheaply. E.g. pallet JINKO SOLAR 440W / 15840Wp FULL BLACK (36x pieces) 4,283.99€

What has definitely become much cheaper now is solar. Nobody buys them anymore. The warehouses are now full of those things, you can get them by the pallet cheaply. For example, pallet JINKO SOLAR 440W / 15840Wp FULL BLACK (36 pieces) 4,283.99€

Take a look at the connection statistics, then your (wrong) interpretation will change.

Take a look at the expansion statistics, then your (wrong) interpretation will change.

The thing with the statistics is a bit tricky, and it belongs to the opaque areas that accompany the energy transition. If they differentiate, then it is between the portion funded according to the Renewable Energy Sources Act and the unfunded portion. I have not been able to clearly recognize that yet.

I once read somewhere that only commercial systems are considered in the expansion statistics, i.e. by companies and not non-commercial entities.

And if so, these can still be catch-up effects; these are probably still orders from last year.

Anyway, last year such a pallet of solar panels easily cost 10-15,000 €.

By the way, it has now even gotten cheaper. There are now 405w solar modules from LONGI (a reputable manufacturer) for UNDER 90€!

Not allowed to share any links, due to advertising rules etc.

But what is wrong with that? It is a fact that material prices are dropping massively because far fewer are building. You also hear that there is hardly any new construction and many houses stay on the market much longer.
Moreover, hardly any loans are being granted anymore.
The craftsmen will have to brace themselves. The whole rip-off will be over soon.
Not allowed to share any links, due to advertising rules etc.

Just a general question:

The rainwater downpipes are shown in the brochure of the turnkey terraced house (picture) running exactly along the property boundary from top to bottom. They are not included in the plans, but they are mentioned in the BBS. Now during construction, it turns out that they do not run centrally on the property boundary but on our side. Basically, I don't care, but in my opinion it looks much better visually if they run centrally and end in the privacy screen (as shown in the brochure).

That is a deviation from the owed contract, legally speaking, right?

Just a general question:

This is not a general question, but a specific one and has little to do with this thread.

This is a deviation from the owed contract, legally speaking, right?

Depends on your contract…

as presented in the exposé

An exposé is only a planning representation of how a project _could_ look and is therefore not a contractual basis.

The burger that you finally get in the box at McD or BK also does not look like the carefully styled burger in the photo on the menu...

What is relevant is what the construction drawing or the construction performance description says. In the exposé, there would also have been a finished front yard shown, which is certainly not included either.