Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

  • Erstellt am 2021-04-23 10:46:58

HeimatBauer

2023-06-27 10:14:25
  • #1


Survivorship bias also plays a role here. We only see the ownership from the 80s/90s that exists – sounds simple, but even back then there were people who couldn’t afford it. Or could only afford a very stripped-down version. My parents moved into a house that was basically still a shell and gradually built it out little by little, and only six years after the birth of their first child did they have central heating. Looking back on it? "That’s just how it was!" Today, apparently, there is some obligation somewhere that EVERYONE builds a single-family house. With a steam cooker. And an extractor hood. Smart, of course. Preferably bling-bling. Infrastructure? Doesn’t matter, just the cheapest, please. Sorry, but with some house discussions I think: My grandparents, despite all hardship, somehow thought things through further.

No, there is neither a right to a single-family house nor a fundamental right to the cheapest possible heating, no matter how polluting it may be.
 

HeimatBauer

2023-06-27 10:20:43
  • #2


I liked the heating engineer who put the whole heating debate into perspective. His experiences align with mine: There is an SUV in front of the door that often has €20k worth of extras alone, but if the heating is €5-10k more expensive, people make a face like they are having a root canal without anesthesia. The SUV will be gotten rid of in 1-2 years, the house you have for decades. Setting priorities? Yes, exactly.

The biggest difference I actually see is in the sincerity regarding one's own prioritization: My grandparents and parents simply say: "Yeah, that's just how it was back then." Today it's: "I HAVE A RIGHT TO AN SUV AND A SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE AND THEY WANT TO TAKE THAT AWAY FROM ME!!!ELEVEN"
 

Winniefred

2023-06-27 10:21:05
  • #3


Yes, that is also part of the issue. If you had to build like that back then, costs would have been significantly higher and many could no longer afford it. Back then, construction was simple because it was possible and at least affordable. That option no longer exists today. You have to keep that in mind.
 

HeimatBauer

2023-06-27 10:30:20
  • #4


Today, unlike in the past, there is the possibility to find a rental apartment in an appropriate price range. That was much less the case back then. People didn’t just build because they could, but also because they had to. Our settlement was built starting in 1960, my in-laws’ row house settlement in 1980/1990. Before that, there were fields.

There are still apartments today of the former "standard," meaning one oil stove per floor, small windows, etc. Why does nobody move in and maybe renovate? Right, because nobody feels like it.
 

WilderSueden

2023-06-27 11:04:16
  • #5
Unfortunately, I can’t quickly find figures for net household income in the 80s, only an average gross income for full-time employees of around 3000 DM. Net per household would probably be about 2000 DM or just above. Today it’s easier, the average net household income is 3600€. Your €7,000 is therefore far above average and with that you can of course finance a €500k house. But that is completely irrelevant for the majority of the population, because they only have about half that. Let’s assume a €200k house with a 2k income, that is one hundred times the net income. But a €500k house with 3.6k is 138 times the net income. Honestly, one must also calculate interest; here I assume 20% equity and a 25-year term for both. The financing in the 80s with 8% interest comes to a DM 1200 installment, and the financing today with 4% interest to €2100. Both times that is close to 60%.
 

Pitiglianio

2023-06-27 11:36:23
  • #6
Net household income of 1987 as 2000 DM is really understated. I already had that in '90 right after my apprenticeship at 19 years old. But apart from that, the purchasing power with 2000 DM was completely different than today. I built for the first time in 1999 with a net household income of just over 4000 DM. Interest rate back then was 6 percent. House construction costs about 250,000 DM. I had to finance 150,000 DM of that. It worked, but also with a lot of own work. Today: Net household income: just under 5000 euros. House construction costs: roughly 500,000 euros. Of that, 300,000 euros financed at 0.9%. It works as well, this time with less own work. But with significantly higher incidental costs (proportionally seen) compared to 1990. With now 4% interest rates it would be impossible for me to build.
 

Similar topics
08.12.2015Construction costs for KFW70 house with basement turnkey15
30.08.2012Real price for single-family house, possibly turnkey28
27.02.2013Turnkey prefabricated house - total price okay?59
19.03.2013Turnkey or build with architects?19
17.08.2013Financing offer - Interest okay? Your opinion...10
11.11.2014The Old Suffering - Turnkey/Individual Contract38
11.02.2015What can one expect from "turnkey"?20
02.03.2015Turnkey house construction, but with own room layout?17
08.04.2015Offer of financial consulting - Is the interest rate okay?15
18.04.2015Is a building savings contract still worthwhile with the current interest rates?10
28.06.2015Building a house - building savings contract with bad interest rates23
28.05.2016Annuity loan - Offered interest rates / Key points?17
22.06.2016Is a TA loan sensible? Interest and loan offer are okay13
27.03.2017Forward loan - Secure interest rates now?53
25.02.2017Price for 1 sqm turnkey?11
25.10.2018How do you take the interest into account from the purchase of the land until moving in?59
12.09.2021Purchase financing: how much equity (with the low interest rates)?27
11.07.2022House construction still realistic despite rising interest rates / construction costs?54
29.09.2022High interest rates with fixed interest, alternative flex loans?54
22.03.2024Home purchase financing despite high interest rates?24

Oben