Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

  • Erstellt am 2021-04-23 10:46:58

cryptoki

2022-05-10 11:12:03
  • #1

Nonsense. 5% - 7%, that makes more sense, or do home builders here earn less than the statistical average annual gross salary?
 

face26

2022-05-10 11:22:22
  • #2
Just doubled the numbers again in the online calculator.

So 10k gross vs. 10.7k gross. With statutory health insurance and tax class I, you end up with net 6.7%. (Probably due to maximum contribution assessment ceilings, I think).

So the net/gross effect is not that big.
 

guckuck2

2022-05-10 11:22:36
  • #3


I will respond to that with a quote from destatis



Households consume from net wages, not gross wages.

The ratio of 14% to 7% from my example will look different for everyone, that's true. But 7% inflation is by no means compensated for by a 7% increase in gross wages.

The effect also exists on the side of the inflation rate. Our household only feels inflation when buying groceries. Energy costs do not concern us much since we consume hardly anything. Gasoline at most one tankful per month, and electricity is secured by ongoing supply contracts (until late autumn this year).
Our housing costs are also fixed thanks to homeownership; there are no rent increases here.
 

cryptoki

2022-05-10 11:23:39
  • #4
Can you build a single-family house with an annual gross income of 10,000 euros? How out of touch is this calculation?
 

face26

2022-05-10 11:25:10
  • #5
Just doubled the numbers again in the online calculator.

So 10k gross vs. 10.7k gross. With statutory health insurance and tax class I, you get a net of 6.7%. (Probably because of the maximum contribution assessment ceilings, I think).

So the net/gross effect


Are you serious now?? Where does it say annual gross??
 

cryptoki

2022-05-10 11:26:27
  • #6
With a monthly gross, the net increase would not be 6.7% with a gross increase of 7%. Maybe sit down and calculate again?
 
Oben