Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

  • Erstellt am 2021-04-23 10:46:58

WilderSueden

2022-10-22 23:09:42
  • #1
But the same annuity just looks the same. And since a) the bank eventually wants to see its money again and b) after several decades there are also renovations that come and cost money, 22 and 40 years of terms are not equal for the bank. Just like the 1% repayment is not insignificant, with that you won’t get a loan from most banks. You can calculate all sorts of things back and forth, ultimately everything comes to the conclusion that higher interest rates are shitty if you have to finance. It doesn’t matter whether you now need a higher rate or it runs for 40 years and slowly the bank becomes the landlord.
 

Crixton

2022-10-22 23:39:55
  • #2
To evaluate this neutrally, an Excel spreadsheet comparing buying with renting is sufficient. Of course, not all developments can be predicted, but it is a good aid to make the right decision for oneself. I cannot understand statements that customers do not care how long the term lasts, how high the residual debt is, and what the total interest payments are, but only care about the monthly installment.
 

SumsumBiene

2022-10-22 23:42:00
  • #3
Yes... 18k are still outstanding. The interest rate is fixed for six months at a time. If they have increased it so drastically now, I have to assume it will go even higher.
 

Traumfaenger

2022-10-22 23:46:59
  • #4

I have to agree with you, although I myself studied finance, controlling, etc. and also have decades of experience as a banker. I do look at the cumulative interest payments, but the decision is made based on the installment and the opportunities (rent, etc.). Whether I as a homeowner will have paid 50,000, 100,000, or more in interest after 10-20 years is secondary. Because everyone else has to pay just as much at that time as I do. There are hardly any savings opportunities on interest, unless you forgo owning your own house.
 

Joedreck

2022-10-23 08:31:04
  • #5
Yes, that's right. That's why I still say that buying a house to live in yourself is a luxury and not a financially worthwhile investment.
 

Kokovi79

2022-10-23 09:18:02
  • #6
Your saying is only true—and even then only approximately—with an unreasonably low initial repayment of 1%. Otherwise, your example does not work mathematically.
 
Oben