WilderSueden
2022-10-22 23:09:42
- #1
But the same annuity just looks the same. And since a) the bank eventually wants to see its money again and b) after several decades there are also renovations that come and cost money, 22 and 40 years of terms are not equal for the bank. Just like the 1% repayment is not insignificant, with that you won’t get a loan from most banks. You can calculate all sorts of things back and forth, ultimately everything comes to the conclusion that higher interest rates are shitty if you have to finance. It doesn’t matter whether you now need a higher rate or it runs for 40 years and slowly the bank becomes the landlord.I did not compare apples to pears verglichen. I simply took the same annuity as an assumption. Sure, you can now increase the rate - but the one who pays a lower rate ceteris paribus could of course also use this for a then higher repayment.