Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

I have my opinion for the following reasons:
- In new buildings, a heat pump should use so little electricity that the additional basic fee eats up the advantage. If this is not the case, the heat pump is either misconfigured, or the new building is too poorly insulated (or there really is a very good tariff).
- Heat pump tariffs allow load management, so the heat pump can be turned off during peak times. But heat pumps do not want to be turned off, they want to run continuously. Additionally, a more powerful heat pump is needed to compensate for the downtime. Both of these lead to additional costs.
- Really cheap heat pump tariffs - in my opinion - will not exist for much longer. They mainly exist because coal and nuclear power are difficult to regulate. Both will not be around for much longer.
- The likelihood of photovoltaic systems increases with every heat pump and every electric car. And by then at the latest, the dual tariff causes additional costs for the electrician.

There is one advantage if you have a heat pump tariff: when photovoltaic systems come, you probably have enough space in the fuse box if you can get rid of the old junk. ;-)

Sorry for the OT...

My opinion is based on the following reasons: - In new buildings, a heat pump should use so little electricity that the additional basic fee erases the advantage. If this is not the case, the heat pump is set incorrectly, or the new building is too poorly insulated (or it really is a very good tariff).

At least here I have to disagree with you: Heat pump tariff 8.5 cents cheaper than normal electricity tariff. Basic fee heat pump tariff 75 euros. So the second tariff pays off from 900 kWh. Which new building needs less? It is switched off twice a day for 1 hour. I don't believe that so much energy is lost during this time that it causes additional costs. All your other arguments are crystal ball reading. Even if Germany shuts down its nuclear power plants, we will continue to receive nuclear power from France. I think so. But with Annalena, it can of course also quickly become very bad and photovoltaics might become mandatory or something like that.

But with Annalena, it can of course also quickly get really bad and photovoltaics might become mandatory or something like that.

Oh, the Construction & Living department is now under the jurisdiction of the Foreign Ministry? I hadn't even noticed that.

But that is really an extreme exception; looking at it nationwide, there is about a ~3 cent difference and a triple-digit basic fee. In the past, the rates were much more attractive, but the differences are becoming smaller and smaller.

For us, for example, it is 2.7 cents and over €110 basic fee. Besides the fact that the standard EVU lockout is 3x2 hours, you really have to be willing for that.

WP tariff 8.5 cents cheaper than normal electricity tariff.

What prices are we talking about specifically?

So the second tariff pays off from 900 kWh. Which new building needs less?

What about the costs for the second meter?

In winter, the French themselves have too little electricity and are already importing our wind power. Please do not read [Springerpresse]!