Scout**
2022-06-22 10:29:14
- #1
Wait a moment, young man! Objection. The storage facilities are only sufficient for the winter if they are almost full AND if the pipelines are filled to nearly 100%. The storage facilities cover about 25% of the annual demand and primarily serve to cover seasonal additional demand (as well as to temporarily compensate for maintenance work in the pipeline network). Since the pipelines from Russia are already running at only 40% capacity and if (!) this is also assumed for winter operation, it will not be enough by any means. Currently, with Russia accounting for around 50% of the supply, there is already a 30% shortfall of the average total import volume, so filling the storage facilities will hardly advance any further. If they remain at 50%, then half of the storage capacity plus 30% of the imports will be missing. This would sum up to around 40% of the gas flows otherwise needed in winter. So under these assumptions, only 60% would be available in winter. And in case of doubt, make a few energy-intensive companies (cement plants, etc.) find the shutdown appealing. With the high prices, many people will discover their frugality anyway. I rather don’t believe that we will start sawing construction timber. With a 40% deficit, it would not be just a "few energy-intensive companies"– the entire German industry consumes 37% of the total gas volume. The entire German industry would therefore be out of the picture. By the way, about another 12% goes to power supply itself – and what many do not consider is that a lot of district heating for households is also linked to this...I do not assume that nothing will come out of the gas pipeline anymore. The storage facilities are almost sufficient for the winter even without Russian gas. Accordingly, they will try to fill them up beforehand.