Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

Poisoning the neighborhood kids and making it impossible to air out the residential area is okay? The recklessness of some people is simply disgusting.

Anyone who heats with new stoves, uses dry wood, and complies with building regulations neither poisons anyone nor makes airing impossible. You should inform yourself before insulting others.

So poisoning the neighbor's children and making it impossible to air out the residential area is okay?

Wood stoves with toddlers should be absolutely taboo. The fine dust pollution indoors has a devastating effect on health. The likelihood of, for example, contracting infections increases significantly, as does asthma.
With all understanding for the tense situation, it's not worth the savings.

The Federal Environment Agency clearly advises against heating with wood.

How about you come up with sources and evidence for all your claims? In the end, someone might actually believe that... You generalize and lump all stoves and fireplaces together, regardless of the emission class.

Anyone who heats with new stoves, uses dry wood, and complies with the structural regulations neither poisons anyone nor makes ventilation impossible. You should inform yourself before insulting others.

Anyone who heats with new stoves, uses dry wood, and complies with the structural regulations neither poisons anyone nor makes ventilation impossible. You should inform yourself before insulting others.

Please inform yourself, for example, at the Federal Environment Agency instead of spreading pub talk.

How about you come up with sources and evidence for all your claims? In the end, someone might actually believe it... You generalize and lump all stoves and fireplaces together, regardless of the emission class.

I have posted or referred to corresponding sources. That you trust a stove seller’s homepage more than the Federal Environment Agency, I cannot change.

Please inform yourself, for example, at the Federal Environment Agency, instead of spreading pub talk.

We have just been building, including installing a chimney. And therefore had to deal with it extensively.

A coefficient of performance of 4 or higher with an air-water heat pump is very well achievable if the installer doesn’t mess up the hydraulics. But most only stick to the standard schemes from the manufacturers, meaning buffer tanks, bypass valves, EER, and a run-of-the-mill underfloor heating design from the system provider/wholesaler with 35°C/28°C.

Yesterday I was at the wood specialist store looking for a 25 mm OSB board 67.5 x 2.50 m. There was still one left for 40€ and no resupply in sight; the manufacturer probably reduced production because demand has plummeted...

Well, at Hornbach they have 300 in stock here for 16 euros each, crap compared to the specialist store

Please inform yourself, for example, at the Federal Environment Agency, instead of spreading pub knowledge.

OK, my last post on the subject, since you apparently are not willing or unable to substantiate your statements.

Source: Federal Environment Agency homepage.
Emissions from small combustion plants in residential areas

,,Only untreated wood (firewood, wood chips, pellets, or briquettes) that has been stored long enough is permitted for combustion. ,,
and
,,Burn only suitable fuel, especially only dry, untreated wood. ,,

The statement by was definitely not pub knowledge.

,,Heating with wood causes significantly higher air-polluting emissions even when done properly than other energy sources such as heating oil or natural gas. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that in some residential areas there may be short-term exposures to fine dust and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) – especially when many wood stoves and fireplaces are operated simultaneously in a residential area and inversion weather conditions occur. ,,

It speaks of some, short-term, with many wood stoves, simultaneously and certain weather conditions. I see no mention of:

Poisoning the neighbor’s children and making ventilation impossible in the residential area is therefore okay? The recklessness of some people is simply disgusting.

,,Air measurements commissioned by the ⁠UBA⁠ showed that wood combustion emissions can make a significant contribution to fine dust pollution in residential areas (Baumbach 2013). This specific temporal and spatial ⁠emission⁠ cannot be assessed for health effects because, on the one hand, there are no measurement stations specific to this source and, on the other hand, there is no short-term health limit value (one-hour value) to assess the health impact. ,,

The article is from 2022 but the measurements are from 2013. Since then there have been regulations requiring new heating installations with significantly better emission classes. Again, I read nothing of:

The Federal Environment Agency clearly advises against heating with wood.

,,When emissions from wood combustion add to the baseline pollution in urban areas, or in certain small-scale situations (for example, the entry of chimney emissions into residential rooms of neighboring buildings), applicable limit values for fine dust can be significantly exceeded. ,,

Here I also read "only urban areas," "certain small-scale situations," and "can be exceeded." So far from general statements and warnings.

Regarding this as well:

Fine dust pollution indoors has devastating effects on health.

I can find nothing on that on the Federal Environment Agency’s site.

Only open fireplaces are criticized.
,,Open fireplaces are very inefficient energetically, (...) significantly pollute indoor air with pollutants ,,

But then I come back to the starting point. You generalize and make claims without evidence. Therefore, I will not engage further with you on this topic.