Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

You should then also please mention the settlement period of 45 days that exists for ongoing contracts between the USA and Russia. That the share then initially increases until the final import ban seems logical. Whether your source can generally be considered reliable, I will leave that open. I have never heard of this "magazine" before anyway.

What false statement have I made now

I found the statement on a site called "Krass und Konkret". Next to this report, another article is linked that describes Butcha only as an alleged trick by the Ukrainians. The publisher of the site is the convinced communist Florian Rötzer, who previously, as editor-in-chief of Telepolis, gave people like Matthias Bröckers (a star of the truther scene) and Jürgen Elsässer (publisher of Compact) a platform. So, far left and far right, united. At least united in their view of the role of Mother Russia and the United States. Anti-imperialist and simplistic to the point of populism.

The claimed 100 kilobarrels import for the last week of March can be found on the linked EIA page under "preliminary data," meaning: it could also be a subsequent report or a correction yet to be made. The USA also consumes around 20 million barrels per day, or 140 million per week. The 100,000 would therefore be only 1:1400 of the consumption, practically a rounding error!

Wow, using Komsomolskaja Prawda as a source – so a Russian daily newspaper that is not independent. When I already read in the articles there that in Ukraine there is only a military special operation going on, I can imagine how independent and fact-based the articles are.

Can we please get back to topic, otherwise the thread will be gone at some point ;)

It's really becoming annoying in here: I got a warning for link/advertising, but I did neither....
So I'm out of this forum. Admin should clean his glasses....

Or, this applies to everyone here, work on your frustration tolerance. I can and could practice and learn this in this forum better than anywhere else in my life. It also helps me outside the forum.

If you have the option at a certain point in time x to choose between a forward loan or a new financing, which is generally cheaper? If this is a stupid question, I apologize.

It depends. There are banks with a BFZ of 18 months that don't really care whether the loan is repaid in 3, 6, or 12 months. Likewise, there are banks that really only do a pure forward and then take over the outstanding balance, or banks that simply do a new financing. In the latter case, you can decide whether to take up the outstanding balance again or just increase the loan to obtain equity. This works without problems because the land charge is transferred from the old to the new bank. However, some banks only provide equity procurement in combination with another financing. Just start looking around. Currently, you should still get under 2% for 10 years.