Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

  • Erstellt am 2021-04-23 10:46:58

Trademark

2022-12-09 14:35:03
  • #1


However, the individual case cannot be generalized. In the end, it remains that social background determines educational success, and which other school than the primary school should the children attend? At the secondary school, the game is practically already over. The learning level differences at the end of primary school are somewhere around 1-2 years of schooling, and this effect remains.

The causes are diverse and have largely to do with education policy (and to a not so small extent with the fact that people who themselves went to school, have children, or have been teaching for 38.5 years believe they are experts in the field of educational research ;))

: Please do not take this as an attack or criticism. My sentences are definitely not meant that way!
 

WilderSueden

2022-12-09 14:49:36
  • #2
I think we need to disentangle the individual problems here. One problem is the compulsive "child must go to the Gymnasium," which would be easy to solve if the three-tier school system were used as such. Genuine overburdening in primary school can be managed through special schools, if one is willing to do so. Another problem is language, as language is the fundamental prerequisite for all subjects. This can be compensated for to some extent through appropriate preschool or childcare. However, this also requires that children actually attend these and that there are enough places available. And then there is the issue of parental behavior. Sure, you can offer afternoon care and homework help. But whether a child is pacified in front of the TV or regularly read to makes a huge difference. This also correlates with social background, but the school can only compensate for it to a limited extent.
 

haydee

2022-12-09 14:52:51
  • #3

including wake-up service and bringing children to school/bus on time as well as automatic school selection.

It is utopian and at some point, a lot of money and resources are tied up to include even the last 5%.

Nevertheless, there is still a lot of room between the current state and the all-inclusive package. Relatively small approaches can still have a big impact.
 

Tolentino

2022-12-09 15:05:02
  • #4
Due to our demographic development and the shortage of skilled workers, we will simply not be able to avoid including the last 5%. As a society, we simply cannot afford to lose children from the precarious class so that they then "train" the next generation of precarious individuals. At the same time, the introduction of a parenting empowerment or child-rearing permit is probably not enforceable, so kindergartens, schools/[Horte] etc. must take on the task of raising functional individuals.
 

haydee

2022-12-09 15:28:12
  • #5


You brought up the 7th grade of secondary school.

It will be a long way before anything changes. None of our children will still be at school by then. There will also be a lot of trial and error.
Flexible classes, team teachers, integrated teaching instead of strict subject division, writing by ear. Just to name a few approaches from recent years.

Then you have relatively unbureaucratic support, like the tutoring budget for the OGS. Those who do not attend (for whatever reason) fall through the cracks again.

I have to distribute the children now and then attend a staff meeting for daycare and OGS. Not because I work there, but because I have taken on personnel responsibility as a "hobby." My opportunity to change something in that area, even if on a small scale.
 

LastCookie

2022-12-09 15:39:41
  • #6


We paid 18.90 net per spot in the filigree ceiling. My contractor passed the costs on to me 1:1 without charging extra.

What something is worth and what it ends up costing is sometimes crazy.
 
Oben