Pinkiponk
2022-05-10 19:36:34
- #1
2. Holding onto plots of land is inexpensive. I saw that with my building gap. The previous owner paid a few euros in property tax per year, that was it. I have long been in favor of imposing a drastic tax increase on plots of land that are not subject to a building obligation but remain undeveloped. We are talking here about land that has been developed for construction. If someone maintains it as a private meadow, they are harming the entire society.
I wanted to spontaneously agree with you; we ourselves have also searched very intensively for a plot (an existing house was not available). To be honest, where we are now building our single-family house was previously a truly beautiful meadow that provided a home for many animals. We will try to preserve that too, but when I walk through Leipzig, I still see many building gaps and very much hope that they will not be developed. However, there should not be parking spaces there either (I say this even though I mostly go to Leipzig by car) as it is now, but truly natural meadows or perhaps small parks.
Edit: I just got an idea. Maybe it would be effective if builders of apartment buildings were required not only to provide parking or garage spaces but also green spaces; that is, that a small park for the tenants must be offered for every apartment building. That would ease urban development in cities and perhaps also convince more people to live in apartments who now want to build a single-family house. But presumably, there are simply too many of us.