kati1337
2023-06-23 09:14:03
- #1
Well, the state isn't stepping in here, we pay pension contributions our whole lives. I find it problematic that someone who has worked there all their life ends up empty-handed. I assume they also don't have corresponding pension contributions (otherwise the whole thing would be absurd). You can do it that way, but what I dislike about the system is this way of thinking it forces old people into. You have a remaining lifespan that is unknown to you, and a remaining amount of money that is well known to you. The older you get, the more you live in fear that you'll run out of money and have to move again. Ideologically, I find that somehow undesirable.I think that's exactly right. Help is given to those who actually need it. Anyone who still owns a property worth 200k doesn't need help but belongs to the upper half. Why should the state step in there? It doesn't do that in Germany either. Then nothing is inherited and you move into a rental apartment, so what. Still better than being dependent on social benefits.