Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

Why, actually we are just explaining why building is still way too cheap! :p

Since it is still not sufficiently clarified how much influence humans actually have on climate change and what CO2 reduction actually achieves, it would be important to analyze this more precisely. If necessary, CO2 must be stored, the first approaches to this are being tested.

There were also severe climate changes long before humans existed.

With the current ruling and especially the incredible reasoning, we can prepare ourselves for completely different things. It is already being announced to restrict freedom rights for reasons of climate protection. Blueprint Corona

Since it is still not sufficiently clarified how much influence humans actually have on climate change and what a CO2 reduction actually achieves, it would be important to analyze this more precisely. If necessary, CO2 must be stored; the first approaches to this are being tested. There were also severe climate changes long before humans existed.

The first paragraph is simply a fake fact from the science-denialism scene. The second paragraph is correct, but completely irrelevant. There is no logical link to the question of human-made global warming.

And after 10 years the driver will then go on foot?

No, only the diesel no longer runs, and the driver switches to something climate-neutral.

But otherwise that is not factually correct either. The footprint arises BECAUSE people buy and drive cars, consume products that are not CO2 neutral, etc.

So a person produces a lot of CO2 during their lifetime that otherwise would not have been generated.

Exactly balancing this consumption against the existence of the potential consumer means: Those who do not generate new buyers themselves can buy much more with the same CO2 balance. What meaningful conclusions does that lead to? I see none...

No, that means those who really want to be consistent and think about the future should not have children because that is the largest amount of CO2 one produces.

By the way, CO2 neutral is a misleading term as it usually means that compensation measures offset the produced CO2.

First paragraph is simply a fake fact from the science-denialism scene. The second paragraph is correct, but completely irrelevant. No logical link to the question of man-made global warming.

You have not understood my intention. We cannot stop climate change, only slow it down at best. That means we are only buying time. Perhaps it would be better to invest more energy in the solution instead of just buying time.