Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

  • Erstellt am 2021-04-23 10:46:58

Gelbwoschdd

2022-04-27 13:32:35
  • #1

Ok, but that assumes the loans were not too high, or am I mistaken?

Edit: since it is a percentage value, the amount itself doesn't matter, my mistake :-/
 

Scout**

2022-04-27 13:59:55
  • #2

So from memories from the 1990s and partly the late 1980s, the typical financing back then always aimed for repayment within 25 to well over 30 years. Going beyond the age of 65 (the retirement age at the time) was considered improper and unfeasible with the bank.

110% financing was unknown for single-family houses. A 60% lending limit was common, up to 80% was possible but already considered more like harakiri especially by the older generation. :) A lot of muscle power was used and counted as equity. Back then, many more acquaintances and friends also got involved in the construction; there also seemed to be relatively more craftsmen than today.

The building plan was drawn and submitted by the cousin (foreman), who also supervised the shell construction and was then assisted by the football club and two uncles. The roof frame was erected by a friend of a friend on several Saturdays with provided helpers. The roof was covered and the heating installed perhaps again on invoice. Other interior finishing was gladly done with the extended family; simpler, diligent tasks like installing insulation or painting were sometimes commissioned for a small wage to the teenage kids from the neighborhood.

In the villages, after work and on Saturdays you could hear hammering, drilling, and sawing everywhere. Many houses were only plastered outside years later; the outdoor facilities were only rudimentarily available at move-in except for the essentials.

Man, that makes one feel old... by the way, I was born in 1975 and lived then in the Vorspessart.
 

WilderSueden

2022-04-27 14:00:04
  • #3

And now you can calculate how many cinema tickets you get for €80. Streaming then quickly looks like a cost-saving measure ;)

I wouldn't demonize all developments here either. Childcare hits financially, but do we want to forbid women to work because of that? And also with the cars... my parents only got a second car when I started kindergarten (at 4, not 1 like today), until then she was relatively immobile at home with 1-2 kids in a village with about 100 households. Without public transport, of course.

But yes, it was paid off differently. Before we children were there, my parents lived off what my mother earned as a medical assistant and put my father's entire salary into the house. With high interest rates, that also means paying a lot.


Although I would add a healthy dose of skepticism here. The average net household income is about €3600, 25% would then be an €800 installment. Let's assume that homeowners earn above average and add 50%, then that's still only €1200. For new financings, that is quite low or incredibly stretched out. I strongly suspect that old financings simply distort the statistics here. Whoever took out a loan 20 years ago and just keeps paying the rate like that now naturally has a pretty low quota.
 

Scout**

2022-04-27 14:06:14
  • #4
In the article from WELT, by working backwards, you come to an average household net income of about €5500. So €1375 payment at 25%. This calculation probably only applies to the households that are actually buying and is not related to all households.
 

44quattrosport

2022-04-27 14:06:28
  • #5
"This means that German homeowners on average spend 25 percent of their income on interest and repayment."

A bit off-topic, but on Sunday I had in my hands the loan contracts of my parents-in-law. GDR.

The figures mentioned now are from memory, so only approximate ;)

1986 house purchase, 10,000 East Marks loan with 1% p.a. interest, monthly rate I don't remember
March 1990 for additions and renovations 40,000 East Marks with 1% p.a. interest, agreed monthly rate for this 68,- East Marks

Interest rate fixation etc. non-existent, just 1%.

The 68,- East Marks of the GDR corresponded to about 25% of the then net salary of my mother-in-law (working 10 hours a week at the time).

No idea how that was then transferred into the world we know today... have to ask sometime.

House price by the way about 8,000, individual flowers in the garden and a porch swing were also listed to be paid for (because value-increasing).
 

Gelbwoschdd

2022-04-27 14:13:19
  • #6
In my opinion, exactly that has to be taken into account in this consideration; otherwise, it is just comparing apples to oranges. But as they say: never trust a statistic you haven't falsified yourself.
 

Similar topics
12.03.2013What is the maximum rate for a net salary of 3,000 euros?24
22.07.2015Young family wants to buy a house, but does the installment fit?15
11.08.2015What can I realistically afford as a rate?51
14.12.2015Does my rate match the salary?38
03.09.2016Interest rate / rate - bank calculation16
13.12.2016Realistic monthly rate59
22.03.2017Is a high first installment common in a payment plan?23
11.11.2018KFW negatively affects the rate. Still use it?11
27.05.2019Feasible? Your assessment regarding the rate and plan44
17.07.2022Single-family house: Is the rate realistic? How much house can we afford?177
25.09.2022Financing monthly installment €2500 with 40 years term117
08.12.2022New rate twice as high - experiences107
01.01.2024How much installment can we afford?42

Oben