Buschreiter
2022-08-17 07:35:39
- #1
…and there are certainly people who pay these moon prices. When I then look at the increases in electricity costs, I fear many long faces after the winter.
Adblocker erkannt
If your quote is correct, then it says "...can". And not MUST. What is so wrong with this way of thinking that a dispute about the qualification of the politicians has to be started here?
The way of thinking itself is certainly not wrong, but actually quite obvious for families with several children. That is, those who initially need a lot of space, which usually stands empty after a foreseeable time.
Nevertheless, this way of thinking is based only on a theoretical approach, which fails in practice due to many factors and is hardly or not at all feasible to implement. At least in today's times, where so many building regulations must be observed and ultimately entail exorbitant additional costs ....
What do you need 180 sqm and more for? Then ask in the forum. You should find enough examples. And please ask about their usage concept at the age of 65 and older.Counter-question: what do you need 180 sqm for? I grew up with five people in 125 sqm and now we are building about 130 sqm for three people, including 2 study rooms. Even though the layout on the upper floor is somewhat compact and could certainly benefit from 20 sqm more, I see absolutely no reason to blow up the house by half again. Somewhere in our size range is the point where more space is not necessary but a luxury. And yes, as a consequence, people will either build new or keep the old house. As long as a change costs 50k, many people will stay in the old house, even if they are not really attached to it. You can always fill the space somehow, even if it’s just the guest rooms at Christmas and on birthdays