Ok, I haven’t watched the video yet (can’t right now) but the transcription of the presumably referenced statements. That means now only regarding the content (since I didn’t see how much he stuttered or was embarrassed): 1. He talks about the fact that a company that no longer produces does not automatically have to go bankrupt. This is factually correct at first, because on the one hand you can give up your business before becoming insolvent (= bankruptcy), which is then called an orderly liquidation or simply business closure. 2. He talks about support programs that are being worked on. In this context – it’s probably been too long – the Corona aid should be recalled, which secured the existence of companies that were no longer "producing" (precisely because of the lockdown). Is it really too far-fetched now to assume that something like this is being planned again? For me, this bashing is initially just typical biting media behavior, especially from the internet community. But as I said, I haven’t seen how he said it, only read what...