That is out of the question for now, but certainly in a few years. When the gas heating has to be removed and we still had time to save. The current burden is already big enough.
That is out of the question for now, but certainly in a few years. When the gas heating has to be removed and we still have time to save. The current burden is already big enough.
Then don’t tie yourselves down with another burden in the form of solar thermal, which you might have to remove from the roof after a few years like others do in order to make room for photovoltaics ;)
Regardless of possible subsidies, solar thermal always loses out against photovoltaics.
Then don't tie yourself down with another burden in the form of solar thermal, which you might, like others, remove from the roof after a few years to make room for photovoltaics ;)
Regardless of possible subsidies, solar thermal always loses out to photovoltaics.
It should be mounted on the facade, the roof remains free :). There is still enough room for photovoltaics afterwards. We can't do everything at once, it simply isn't possible. I would like to do it, but we don't want to over-indebt ourselves and we have spoken with enough people from the field and the industry; better solutions for old buildings will come onto the market in the next few years than currently exist, and we'll wait those few years.
Spiegel has an article today titled "Construction prices increase by almost 17 percent" with the source [Statistisches Bundesamt]. This referred to November 2022 compared to November of the previous year. But also: "From August to November alone, construction prices increased by 2.5 percent."
for the money of a solar thermal system you can produce domestic hot water with gas for a very long time
Somehow I don’t understand things like that. Sure, we can just leave everything as it is. The 1921 floor without insulation, the front door from 1993, and the gas heating until it falls apart. Would everyone here prefer that?