Construction costs are currently skyrocketing

Pellets are oil/gas/coal, just without having lain in the ground for 100 million years. The only difference. Burning in 1 hour what took 1 year to grow is simply stupid from a CO2 balance perspective. And whether a few ages have passed in between is completely irrelevant.

Pallets do make sense, however, if they are made from waste wood.

As long as one is supplied with 100% H2, which is supposed to be the goal somewhere.

Unfortunately, the mistake was in the last sentence. That is not the goal for anyone who does not have way too much money. The difference between H2 and heat pump heating is about a factor of five in heating costs. Even in 50 years. Physics is just an idiot.

Unfortunately, the misconception was in the last sentence. That is not the goal for anyone who doesn’t have way too much money. The difference in heating costs between H2 and heat pump heating is about a factor of five. Even in 50 years. Physics is just a dimwit.

Maybe I can still teach you, who apparently knows everything better, the synergy of supply and demand:

H2 is currently hardly used at all, or only produced in very small quantities --> supply low --> price high!
The H2 strategy is supposed to ensure that H2 will be available in sufficient quantities by 2045 and will replace natural gas in the future --> supply high --> price low!

Surely you also know (since you apparently know everything) that the kWh of electricity will not cost less in the future ;)
By the way, just like the evil, evil oil...

But I understand you. A Deliverer has to deliver! ;)

Pellets are oil/gas/coal, just without having lain in the ground for 100 million years. The only difference. Burning in 1 hour what took 1 year to grow is simply stupid from a CO2 balance perspective.

The approach is ideally meant to rather use the effect that dead wood, which releases CO2 again during rotting/decay, should preferably have this rotting/burning done in the stove while heating, and in the same amount. But this only applies to dead wood. It becomes absurd again when wood pellets from felled trees from Norway are shipped to northern Germany to be burned in the combined heat and power plant.

H2 is currently hardly used at all, or only produced in very small quantities --> supply low --> price high! The H2 strategy is intended to ensure that H2 is available in sufficient quantities by 2045 and will replace natural gas in the future --> supply high --> price low!

the logic is consistent, but the problem is quantitative in nature (as with SynFuel):

To produce 1 kWh of heating energy from H2 via electrolysis, you first have to put in much larger amounts of electricity. I vaguely remember something about a factor of 5. Even if the electricity were produced "green," according to that, the number of wind turbines would have to be multiplied by 5 compared to today for the same amount of energy from H2. And this is in a situation where we hardly find space for new additional wind turbines in Germany today. Additionally, there would be the extra primary energy effort required for the production of these additional ...

So this can only function minimally as long as the wind turbines currently produce more electricity than can be consumed on the grid.

It therefore remains a niche solution; unfortunately, it is probably not suitable for a strategic approach.