i_b_n_a_n
2023-01-12 19:51:26
- #1
That surprises me, because I consider 2 machines that communicate with each other and develop their own, more efficient language entirely on their own to be extraordinarily intelligent. When was that again? 2017 at Facebook?
And then there was the guy who did an experiment with his microwave, which in the end wanted to let him in and grill him.
It basically only fails due to limited computing power. Once quantum computers have solved that, nothing will stand in the way of AI.
I don’t believe it will happen only by the end of the century. Maybe 2050.
I believe I know quite well the current limits of machines. But I was also asking about the (your) definition of intelligence. A well-made “expert system” already convincingly pretends to the user, as you said, that there is a real human being on the other end of the line. For example, in the area of automatically generated texts (newspaper, lyrics, etc.) atrocious things are currently happening in my opinion. Not everyone can use that yet (fortunately). But I actually mean the point in time when “artificial intelligences develop their own consciousness.” And many scientists and other experts largely agree that this will never happen (unfortunately I couldn’t find the definition of “never” in this context). Maybe I’m just reading the wrong books and magazines? But in 30 years I personally consider that impossible. I have now been working in IT for over 35 years. If I extrapolate the development over this period, I can’t help but put in at least 200 to 300 years for that.
Most likely I will no longer be able to verify that... too bad? If you turn out to be right, I might have the bad luck to experience it...