Joedreck
2022-06-30 08:52:52
- #1
If we compare the city of Nuremberg with Dresden, for example, the picture is confirmed.
While in Nuremberg a foreigner proportion of about 25 percent has established itself, in Dresden it is only 9 percent.
There is a housing shortage in Nuremberg, whereas in Dresden [we] are demolishing. As already described, demolition subsidized with significant tax funds.
The influx of migrants is largely limited to the western German metropolitan areas with their well-known housing problems. This exacerbates the problems even further.
In Halle an der Saale alone, 20,000 apartments stand vacant. There used to be housing control. That would be completely normal.
However, the population density of a region is also decisive. And here Nuremberg, with 2765 inhabitants per km², is significantly more densely populated than, for example, Dresden with only 1693 inhabitants per km².
Stuttgart, with 3040 inhabitants per km², has almost double the density of Dresden. Accordingly, the real estate market is also denser.
While a new single-family house has become almost impossible in Stuttgart, you can still build in Dresden almost carefree and relatively inexpensively.
But that’s just a thought. It’s also a question of quality of life.
A great presentation of a correlation while ignoring all historical and social factors. Many years of the Iron Curtain, the Marshall Plan, the rebuilding of the western economy with the help of guest workers, and many other points are not taken into account in this short-sighted (and too narrowly considered) presentation.
To start, I recommend looking up the meaning of correlation and causation.
You can tell you’re a craftsman. You just never had contact with scientific methods to research and present connections. That doesn’t matter at the pub table anyway.