bavariandream
2022-06-20 18:54:08
- #1
I am of the opinion that we could leave the highways to the people who want to drive quickly, and the other drivers just take the country roads and federal roads, where then their desired speed applies.
Or everyone for whom 130 km/h is not fast enough pays an additional CO2 tax and higher health insurance contributions.
Not referring to your post: So honestly, the fact that there is still no serious discussion about a speed limit in Germany, but Habeck is calling on the population to change their showerhead, is pretty absurd. Denying that a speed limit brings environmental benefits (and also reduces the accident risk on the side) is also absurd, when you see in other countries that it does have an effect, and there are also clear studies on this.
It is not possible in D on highways because there is always something (construction site, traffic jam,) I would argue that this constant re-acceleration from 80 to 120-130 consumes more than driving constantly at e.g. 170.
And why do you have to brake and accelerate constantly at a speed of 130 km/h, but not at a speed of 170 km/h?