The financing is feasible, however, I do not understand what the building savings contract is supposed to achieve and why KfW is supposed to be waived.
The remaining debt of the KfW after 10 years can be secured via a building savings contract, i.e. the remaining debt is repaid at 2% with the purchased building savings loan (the rest is building savings credit, but at least it is interest-bearing at 1%) after 10 years. Building savings contract interest credit – if it was chosen sensibly – 1%!! This in turn means that the payment interest is not much more expensive than the investment interest in the building savings contract, thus only a slight loss in repayment. The profit lies in the secured follow-up financing at 2% building savings loan interest.
If interest rates are low in 10 years, the building savings loan can be waived, and half a year later the entire financing – including the portion fixed with a longer fixed interest period than 10 years – can be refinanced according to Building Code §489.
Regarding the other component, I would definitely not be willing to pay 2.9% interest for 15 years (which is anyway much too expensive an interest rate) in order to then simultaneously get 0.15%-0.25% investment interest on my repayment capital. The marginal interest rate compared to an annuity is then far too high for it to make sense compared to an annuity loan. Of course, this is only relatively too high since we do not know where the interest rate will be in 15 years. By this I mean that today I would not be willing to minimize the risk with a marginal interest rate of around 4% for an annuity. I would rather consider an annuity loan with at least a 20-year fixed interest period, where the mixed interest rate on a 100% financing never lies at 2.9%. It would also have to be questioned whether the LBS contract will even be allocable in 15 years. If it is, the repayment portion would be far too high, since the interest loss would be even greater, because the repayment portion is fixed at 0.15% whereas I pay 2.9%. If it is not, everyone must ask themselves what this building savings contract as a deferred repayment component should be for now!!
By the way, there are all kinds of nice advertisements flying around here, including banks that currently offer 15 years (if I actually want this at all) annuity loans at nominal 2.2% at 100% depending on the area. If I combine this condition with the deferred repayment variant desired with the F60 tariff of Signal Iduna Building Society instead of the Sparkasse with the poor LBS tariff, it could work; however, fundamentally the question remains why not annuity repayment with a longer fixed interest period and integration of the KfW component with the interest rate hedging instrument – but with a selected tariff on the market – building savings.