Increase in property transfer tax in NRW

  • Erstellt am 2014-10-28 14:14:51

Skaddler

2014-10-29 17:48:52
  • #1
It was generally about taxes, you should be able to have understood that. As for the rest of the nonsense, I at least have doubts.
 

Bieber0815

2014-10-29 18:13:38
  • #2
It would make sense to massively reduce or even eliminate the real estate transfer tax for the purchase of a property for personal use. Five percent and more is simply an insane amount of money in connection with real estate.
 

nathi

2014-10-29 22:58:14
  • #3
Well, most people only pay property transfer tax once or twice in their lives, if at all. Therefore, raising it hardly scares away any voters.
 

Bauabenteurer

2014-10-30 07:08:19
  • #4


The fact is also that it usually concerns people with corresponding income. It doesn't affect the poor, society bears it.. :confused:
 

Doc.Schnaggls

2014-10-30 12:42:08
  • #5


That may be true. However, once again, the person who acts responsibly and proactively and builds their own home (also as security for retirement) and forgoes short-term consumption is basically punished with an additional tax, which I find not really logically explainable.

I can understand development contributions, VAT for the building project, and if necessary also property tax – but why the state hits private individuals so hard when acquiring real estate (it has already been mentioned how it works for companies) is absolutely incomprehensible to me.

On the other hand, anyone who lives carefree day by day and neither saves nor builds up anything can rely on the social safety net to catch them if necessary.

In my opinion, there is something fundamentally wrong in our state.

Best regards,

Dirk
 

Bieber0815

2014-10-30 19:21:26
  • #6
There may be people who don’t know what to do with their money and buy real estate for the fun of it. But very often the case is that quite ordinary average people simply want to have their own place. Something completely normal, natural. Their own cave, without paying rent to someone who for whatever reason calls a house his property, which he doesn’t even need to live in. And these average homeowners (by no means all high earners) also have to bear this heavy burden.

(Yes, low earners are usually not directly affected, I admit that.)
 

Similar topics
28.12.2011Objection to real estate transfer tax15
04.10.2012Real estate transfer tax10
01.12.2014Real estate transfer tax / what is the tax applied to? Which developer MUST?30
09.01.2018Trends in property acquisition tax24
03.11.2014Real estate transfer tax, who is familiar with it?16
05.02.2015Is it possible for the partner to contribute to the real estate transfer tax?11
14.12.2017Property acquisition tax notice for land same contract document21
03.06.2015How are the notary fees and real estate transfer tax calculated?26
06.12.2016Contract for work before property purchase - real estate acquisition tax?10
21.01.2016Paying out partner and second time real estate transfer tax28
04.07.2016Purchase of property under a work contract12
24.03.2017Property acquisition tax - Was everything calculated correctly?16
29.11.2017Timeline of real estate acquisition tax and house construction contract20
26.07.2018Additional financing for real estate transfer tax47
24.02.2019Property acquisition tax on a house not yet built - yes/no?13
30.01.2020Tax office questionnaire for the assessment of real estate transfer tax11
05.02.2021Property acquisition tax on house construction - when?15
18.04.2021Hidden property owner model - real estate transfer tax/value-added tax10
25.03.2023Home financing ever possible? Probably not!787

Oben