kaho674
2017-09-11 09:37:32
- #1
Could it be that the 1.98 m was marked in the drawing as a reference? Because the upper end of the line does not match any drawn edge on the building at all. Could it perhaps be a planning error?
I thought so at first too, but it seems to be an optical illusion.
The loss of space is certainly annoying. What worries me more at the moment is that somewhere a mistake was made. For example, forgetting the rafters or something similar.
In principle, you could exactly calculate the missing enclosed space. Then relate it to the roof price or cheekily ask what an enclosed roof space of value x normally costs.