Roof constructed too flat - Construction company does not acknowledge the defect

  • Erstellt am 2017-09-10 14:57:26

kaho674

2017-09-11 09:37:32
  • #1

I thought so at first too, but it seems to be an optical illusion.

The loss of space is certainly annoying. What worries me more at the moment is that somewhere a mistake was made. For example, forgetting the rafters or something similar.

In principle, you could exactly calculate the missing enclosed space. Then relate it to the roof price or cheekily ask what an enclosed roof space of value x normally costs.
 

baufix42

2017-09-11 11:05:02
  • #2
The dimensional differences in the construction industry must first be taken into account; whether they can be applied will be told to you by a state-certified building surveyor.
 

Redsonic

2017-09-12 08:25:11
  • #3
Good morning everyone and thank you very, very much for the numerous responses.

It is actually an optical illusion in the plan. That happens to everyone I show the measurement to, and then at the latest on the iPhone screen edge it becomes clear that it goes all the way to the lower edge of the peak.

No one can tell me why this is the case. Probably really a planning error. The architect probably still works with an old program. Back then, he had to do all the cuts by hand. The site manager says that the carpenter may have used different beam thicknesses. The foot purlin is in place.

The building expert gave a thorough reprimand. Only after the construction company's response did I bring up the financial compensation.

If I could measure the ridge height of 8.16 m, this discussion about the approximate measurement could be avoided. I just can't imagine how, Pythagoras or not. The scaffolding is already gone. I'm missing the distance to the center point even if I get the ridge laser-measured from below standing next to the house.

But quite specifically: do I now have to observe any deadlines because of the defect, or can this issue be postponed until the final acceptance? I still have a floor slab for the garage to do.

Best regards
Redsonic
 

11ant

2017-09-12 14:07:44
  • #4
If the slanting was done carelessly and the 12 cm are missing at the peak, I see the error as minor; if the 12 cm are missing linearly in height, the error must lie elsewhere and is, in my opinion, more serious. However, I wonder what this measurement is even supposed to be good for: in practice, no one goes exactly in the middle there, so a certain height only along this line is of little use. The standing height under the purlin ring would have been the one worth defining. However, I would not call it an "optical illusion," but rather planning nonsense.
 

Redsonic

2017-09-12 17:02:39
  • #5
The purpose of the height is certainly open to debate. We knew that it would be a storage attic, which would mostly be entered while bent over, and every degree of roof pitch was supposed to cost another €500. At the time, we were at the stage where we didn’t want to spend any more money. Therefore, my requirement was to have a space of about 1.5 x 1.5 m where I could stand upright under the roof at 1.76 m.

That would have been the case at 1.98 m. Now it is still the case, but the standing area has shrunk to 0.5 x 0.5 m. And that is the actual problem. Especially since formwork boards will still be added as flooring.

Now it is only a matter of clearly reporting the defect, possibly substantiating it by a deviation in the ridge height, and obtaining the highest possible compensation.
 

Alex85

2017-09-12 18:11:20
  • #6


You take a few steps in front of the house and place the measuring device on the ground. Measure once against the house wall and then diagonally upwards from ground level to the gable. Then you have measured c and a, b is what you’re looking for and shouldn’t be a problem anymore.
You can also go up on the roof and measure down from the gable.
For more precision, a surveyor or someone with such equipment can help you.
 

Similar topics
25.05.2015Extractor hood / roof or wall14
03.03.2015Insulating the roof with kitchen paper/toilet paper12
24.05.2015KfW 55 with wooden house - U-values: Wall 0.18 - Roof 0.1617
05.05.2016Insulate the roof: flakes, panels or wool17
07.03.2020Children's room on the upper floor open up to the roof25
20.09.2016Extending walls beyond the roof?!43
10.03.2017Roof design / Use of 2nd floor mandatory with 2 full floors23
20.10.2017Roof with photovoltaic or other investment, any experiences?19
21.10.2017Sealing the base slab before the roof is installed19
20.04.2018Roof covered with fake tiles - house accepted.12
29.10.2018Roof, flat roof, gable roof, shed roof - How much does each cost?22
25.03.2019Ceiling suddenly too small for controlled residential ventilation!54
02.07.2019Purlin distance from exterior wall or roof16
02.12.2019Single-family house (2 floors + residential basement + developed attic) approximately 200 sqm - changes162
07.12.2019Bank guarantee from the roofer due to defects in the roof16
27.12.2019Low ridge height results in a low knee wall55
25.02.2020Prefabricated wooden house, gable, weather protection paint21
02.07.2024Development according to §34 - Large house with steep roof required11
22.02.2025Online tool to plan (Walm-) roof32
10.05.2025Floor plan of a single-family house measuring 14x14 meters with limited ridge height35

Oben