Maybe he will distract us from symmetry by suggesting alternatives that are pleasing to us. I know that symmetry is currently not in fashion
What does the "distract" mean in this context? - have you so far only a vague desire for symmetry or already a concrete symmetrical preliminary design in mind? One builds the first house for an enemy, the second for a friend, and the third for oneself - the fourth house for fashion can then be omitted. Symmetry is
not a value in itself - so neither positive nor negative. Symmetry itself is therefore not bad, counterproductive, or detrimental. It is merely not a guarantee of aesthetics (and even the more significant proportion alone is not that), and what is to be advised against is only the symmetry
dogma. If one does not subordinate anything to symmetry, it also does not ruin anything. By the way, what has somewhat been forgotten today: churches considered particularly beautiful in today’s construction times regarded
perfect symmetry even as blasphemous.