House Pictures Chat Corner - Show off your house pictures!

  • Erstellt am 2015-11-25 10:27:31

kaho674

2017-10-25 13:47:41
  • #1
Fast, inaccurate with rework is often cheaper than slow, precise and without rework. For quality, it doesn't matter.
 

Egon12

2017-10-25 13:50:34
  • #2
In his enthusiasm, that was probably the last picture of the brewmaster
 

11ant

2017-10-25 14:00:51
  • #3

So, there's really nothing right about that statement: reworking (or trimming patch stones) takes much more time than working steadily. Creating fantasy dimensions during planning backfires in every stone layer. "Inaccurate" in the sense of standards with practical tolerances is good, but "inaccurate" meaning "doesn't matter if crooked and warped" is not. And there is no product quality that isn't affected by sloppy planning.
 

ypg

2017-10-25 14:19:17
  • #4
@Bierbrauer Don't let anyone take away your joy [emoji2]
 

11ant

2017-10-25 14:27:02
  • #5
Why should I, that would be neither intended nor "justified": what you can already see of the house looks quite nice. The planner messed up, but it's not serious, and the masons themselves probably didn't. So all good.
 

RobsonMKK

2017-10-25 17:51:50
  • #6
What kind of nonsense do you have to read here... sometimes you really want to use the words that are going through your head.

But I totally agree with Alex.

And what exactly is your qualification to comment on everything and everyone?
 

Similar topics
21.05.2019Water connection installed incorrectly - Right to correction from the general contractor?39
26.07.2023Very messy parquet laying work - Is rework not possible?113

Oben