The explanation doesn't make any sense (?) Without structural analysis, no execution, and in the structural analysis the support could have been designed correspondingly narrow.
The explanation doesn't make any sense (?)
No execution without static calculations, and in the static calculations the support could have been designed correspondingly narrow.
I didn't say after execution, but after planning approval.
The explanation doesn’t make any sense (?). Without structural analysis, no execution, and in the structural analysis, one could have dimensioned the support accordingly narrow.
I’m fresh and lively again! Why do you think the support could have been made narrower? Apparently, that’s how the structural engineer calculated it. The chimney width, as I actually wanted it, was not sufficient to carry the load of the ceiling.
Furthermore, on the floor area of 91sqm per floor, at least on the ground floor, the only load-bearing walls are the exterior walls (on an 8.25m x 11m floor area) and the small 2m walls of the stairwell.
I don't have to be a structural engineer to know that something solid is needed on the ground floor.
But yes, I would have wished for something narrower.