@11ant you massively underestimate the demand for every conceivable type of property in @goalkeepers area.
? ? ?
In two years the area will be full, guaranteed.
Why in two years? It’s all already "gone"!
And there is also the building obligation within two years.
Exactly. And only a few will fulfill (or be able to fulfill) that. Refinancing one and a half meters of fill isn’t something you can just magically do like Bibi Blocksberg. And the meter for those two years keeps running while you first get to know the neighbors and deal with them, when owners with basements, without basements, and don’t-know-if-they-have-basements build next to each other. Several plots will still fall through without successors stepping in. And as a result, I see three houses sprinkled later on in an otherwise undeveloped area. The municipality will then only buy that in one bloc from one person. And in turn, I see two scenarios as likely: A) the existing buildings stay and the "gaps" are gradually closed concertedly; B) the investor buys only under the condition of paying off the existing homeowners and being able to demolish everything again. If in B) even one owner "blocks," it stays with three houses, the settlement gets the nickname "Gap Village" and the first precedent arises of a mayor who is tarred and feathered personally by the president of the Court of Auditors. Schilda – a name the world will remember.