After a small discussion among friends, I can only say that many see this draft as half-baked. Why should all "new builders/buyers" be supported for 10 years and those who took the same step because of children not even one year? That is so disproportionate. Why not something along the lines of: general support for owners with small children who have bought/afforded property because of the children. To make it less disproportionate, one could also introduce that buyers who bought 9 years ago still receive support for 1 year, those who bought 8 years ago for 2 years, and so on...