Zaba12
2018-06-27 13:01:19
- #1
For us, it would be 500 euros every month. That’s something I’ll have to struggle with internally if we don’t get the subsidy. Hardly any large families buy a house with 10 rooms in their mid-20s and say, "we’ll fill them all" [emoji23]. Usually, you buy with 1-2 kids, and the large families in our circle of acquaintances then mostly move into a second house. So it’s really stupid, because you specifically buy/build bigger for the kids and then get nothing in return. On the other hand, families with 1-2 children, where both parents can easily work, usually earn more money and wouldn’t be as dependent on a subsidy as families with many children.
It annoys me. Back then, as students with two small children and jobs, we bought our first house, which has now become too small with 5 children. We always worked like crazy, and I went back to university and work with the baby in a sling eight weeks after giving birth each time. Now we have to build new due to lack of space and don’t get child construction subsidy. Instead, we have to support, through our taxes, the construction for families with good incomes who possibly have only 1-2 kids. Honestly, I’m not up for that either. So justice looks different again.
When did you build/buy your first house? If it wasn’t just 1-2 years ago, then you still had the chance to buy/build cheaply!
I understand that you’re "pissed" now because of the number of children, as you’re losing a lot of money. But from the start of the debate it was never guaranteed to you. It was never said that a second purchase would be subsidized. I feel more sorry for those who just barely missed the subsidy at the end of 2018. But losing control so much now that you have to vent here isn’t nice.