Dr Hix
2019-01-21 10:59:34
- #1
And topic lawsuits: I can hardly argue "because of the BKG," the situation has already existed in this form for two years.
But you wrote in #1064 that the child is more often with you than with him.
That is already reason enough: § 22 BMG Abs.2
If that is really the case, theoretically he would owe you (retroactive) child support as well (it would no longer be a factual 50:50). Maybe you can reach him through this approach